case of Hongkong, more especially as I have had
occasion in the past to draw attention to the
fact that the inclusion of expenditure credite
in the accounts of Hongkong has had the effect
of concealing considerable amounts of unauthorised
expenditure in the account (vide paragraph 5 of·
my report to the Secretary of State on the
Hongkong Account for the year 1922).
3. I have no additional comments to offer
with regard to the first three points in my
Reference Sheet (which are referred to in para-
graphs 2 to 4 of the Governor's despatch) but,
in connection with the fourth point (recovery
of Postal transit charges) which is dealt with
at length in the concluding paragraphs of the
despatch, I would refer to the correspondence
which was enclosed in the C.0. letter to the
Comptroller and Auditor General, No.11667/1910
of the 29th of April, 1910 (copy enclosed) and
to Section 3 of Hongkong Ordinance No.1 of 1901,
from which it appears to be very doubtful whether
the treatment of such recoveries as expenditure
credite instead of including them in the "gros8
receipts" of the Postal Department is in accord-
ance with the existing authorities governing the
calculation of the Military Contribution.
I am not aware to what extent, if any,
the general question of expenditure credits in
Hongkong is influenced by the existence of the
assessment on revenue for Military Contribution,
but, in my view, if it is considered to be
desirable that certain items of revenue should
be exempted from such assessment, the correct
procedure to be followed is that which has
already
56391 18
already been adopted in the case of the sale
of returned P.W.D. Stores (enclosure 3 in
Reference Sheet No.3/1923).
Mr.
Engens
12.7.26
Will you please draft for conson on
above minute and pass draft through Sir 2.
Stephensen.
The allusion to the defunct M11. Cont. Com:-
mittee can be ignored,
At once
A.E.Collins
29.1.26
330
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.